MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Emerging Therapies Mimicking the Effects of Amylin and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

2006· review· en· W2111738450 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew C. Riddle, Daniel J. Drucker

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsAmylinMedicineGlycemicPostprandialGastric emptyingType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusInsulinIncretinHormoneGlucose homeostasisExenatideInternal medicineEndocrinologyPharmacologyBioinformaticsInsulin resistanceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current therapies for type 2 diabetesare frequently associated with inad-equate control of postprandial hy-perglycemia, weight gain, and, in the case of oral agents, loss of efficacy over time. A better understanding of physiological re-sponses to meals is leading to the devel-opment of new agents whose therapeutic action is based on the enhancement of gastrointestinal hormone action. These therapies are associated with slowing of gastric emptying, stimulation of insulin and inhibition of glucagon secretion, im-proved control of postprandial hypergly-cemia, and control of body weight. This review summarizes several limitations in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and de-scribes the mechanisms of action and clinical data obtained with amylin and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors for the treatment of diabetes. Despite considerable effort by patients and physicians, the results of treating type 2 diabetes are often disappointing. This re-view examines the limitations of current an-tihyperglycemic therapies and assesses the potential of the emerging class of agents that mimic or enhance the actions of amylin and GLP-1,which are both gastrointestinal pep-tide hormones that in concert with insulin and glucagon regulate fuel homeostasis and eating behavior (1–4). Several agents from this class have been recently approved for clinical use or are in the advanced stages of development. Their mechanisms of action and therapeutic effects, as described in peer-reviewed publications, will be dis-cussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207