MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111749588 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet175

A single slice measure of epicardial adipose tissue can serve as an indirect measure of total epicardial adipose tissue burden and is associated with obstructive coronary artery disease

2013· article· en· W2111749588 on OpenAlexaff
Trung N. Tran, G. W. Small, Myra Cocker, Yeung Yam, Benjamin J.W. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpicardial adipose tissueAdipose tissueEpicardial fatCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineMedicineMeasure (data warehouse)ArteryComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: To evaluate the practical use of the single slice measurement of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) at the level of the left main coronary artery (EATLM) in predicting the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Quantification of EATTotal and EATLM was performed on non-contrast CT scans of consecutive patients (without history of revascularization, cardiac transplantation, device implantation, and congenital heart disease) who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) between May 2011 and July 2011. One hundred and ninety-two patients were evaluated, of which 47 had obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis). EATLM (3.8 ± 2.2 cm(3)) and EATTotal (126.2 ± 56.3 cm(3)) are highly correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that both EATLM (OR: 1.204 per 1 cm(3), 95% CI: 1.028-1.411, P = 0.021) and EATTotal (OR: 1.007 per 10 cm(3), 95% CI: 1.000-1.013, P = 0.038) are associated with obstructive CAD. However, when the CAC score was added to multivariate analysis, both failed to show statistical significance. (EATTotal, OR 1.004 per 1 cm(3), 95% CI: 0.996-1.011, P = 0.328 and EATLM, OR: 1.136 per 10 cm(3), 95% CI: 0.948-1.362) ROC curve analysis revealed that both EATTotal and EATLM are of incremental value in detecting CAD, when compared with clinical risk scores (NCEP plus EATTotal plus BMI and NCEP plus EATLM plus BMI vs. NCEP alone; AUC 0.7090, P = 0.009 and 0.7167, P = 0.003 vs. 0.6069, respectively). CONCLUSION: Measuring epicardial adipose tissue on a single slice at the level of the left main coronary artery may serve as an indirect measure of total epicardial adipose tissue burden. EATLM and EATTotal are independently associated with obstructive coronary artery disease and are incremental to traditional risk factors for predicting its presence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207