Increased lung clearance of isoflurane shortens emergence in obesity: a prospective randomized‐controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a concern that obesity may play a role in prolonging emergence from fat-soluble inhalational anaesthetics. We hypothesized that increased pulmonary clearance of isoflurane will shorten immediate recovery from anaesthesia and post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay in obese patients. METHODS: After Ethics Review Board approval, 44 ASA I-III patients with BMI>30 kg/m(2) undergoing elective gynaecological or urological surgery were randomized after completion of surgery to either an isocapnic hyperpnoea (IH) or a conventional recovery (C) group. The anaesthesia protocol included propofol, fentanyl, morphine, rocuronium and isoflurane in air/O(2) . Groups were compared using unpaired t-test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Minute ventilation in the IH group before extubation was 22.6 ± 2.7 vs. 6.3 ± 1.8 l/min in the C group. Compared with C, the IH group had a shorter time to extubation (5.4 ± 2.7 vs. 15.8 ± 2.7 min, P<0.01), initiation of spontaneous ventilation (2.7 ± 2.3 vs. 6.5 ± 4.5 min, P<0.01), BIS recovery >75 (3.2 ± 2.3 vs. 8.9 ± 5.8 min, P<0.01), eye opening (4.6 ± 2.9 vs. 13.6 ± 7.1 min, P<0.01) and eligibility for leaving the operating room (7.1 ± 2.9 vs. 19.9 ± 11.9 min, P<0.01). There was no difference in time for eligibility for PACU discharge. CONCLUSION: Increasing alveolar ventilation enhances anaesthetic elimination and accelerates short-term recovery in obese patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".