Designing heterodimeric two‐stranded α‐helical coiled‐coils: the effect of chain length on protein folding, stability and specificity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The E/K coil, a heterodimeric coiled-coil, has been designed as a universal peptide capture and delivery system for use in applications such as biosensors and affinity chromatography. In this design, heterodimer formation is specified through the placement of charged residues at the e and g positions of the heptad repeat. The affinity and stability of the E/K coil has been modified in order to allow a greater range of conditions for association and dissociation by varying the chain length to obtain three, four and five heptad coiled-coils (21, 28 and 35 residues per polypeptide chain). The effect of chain length on stability and folding was examined by circular dichroism spectroscopy, guanidine hydrochloride denaturation, and redox equilibrium experiments. It was found that increases in chain length produced increases in the stability of heterodimeric coiled-coils, but in a nonlinear fashion. The resulting disulfide-bridged heterostranded molecules and reduced heterodimers span a wide range of stabilities (deltaG=3.3-11.9 kcal/mol), greatly expanding their scope for use in protein engineering and biomedical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".