MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111792673 · doi:10.1109/mvt.2009.932541

Global modeling and control strategy simulation

2009· article· en· W2111792673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsAlberta University of the Arts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuously variable transmissionAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringTorqueTransmission (telecommunications)EngineeringCo-simulationElectric vehicleControl systemPower (physics)Computer scienceSimulationElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To optimize the operation of internal combustion engine (ICE), maximize fuel economy, and minimize emissions, many novel traction schemes have been developed. Among those, an electromechanical converter known as electric variable transmission (EVT) was presented in, which enables a continuously variable transmission (CVT), starter, and generator. It is especially suitable for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) as a series- and parallel-hybrid or a split-power hybrid transmission system. Similar designs could be found in with emphasis on either the design of machine structure and cooling or the analysis of electromagnetic field coupling. However, to successfully use EVT in HEVs, it is necessary to study the vehicle power flows and EVT control method to satisfy vehicle performance and optimize operation of subsystems. Besides, the EVT design specifications, such as rated power, rated torque and rated speed, are also closely related to the vehicle control target and control strategy.The objective of this article is to provide a control strategy for an HEV using an EVT. A global modeling for an EVT equipped HEV is needed to develop control strategy. Energetic macroscopic representation (EMR) is used to model such a complex system. It is a graphical tool (see "Synoptic of EMR") suitable for modeling and control of complex electromechanical systems. Using EMR, the interconnection of subsystems is organized according to the physical causality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it