MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111795445 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2006.876852

Joint Estimation of Carrier Frequency Offset and Statistical Parameters of the Multipath Fading Channel

2006· article· en· W2111795445 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nissila, S. Pasupathy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingMultipath propagationChannel state informationRayleigh fadingEstimatorComputer scienceAlgorithmFrequency offsetFading distributionChannel (broadcasting)Autoregressive modelCarrier frequency offsetElectronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatisticsWirelessOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we focus on the joint estimation of the carrier frequency offset and statistical parameters of the multipath mobile channel. By modeling the multipath fading channel with a complex bandpass autoregressive (AR) model, we show how the estimates for the frequency offset, Doppler spread, and power profile of the multipath channel can be extracted from the estimated complex AR coefficients obtained via the expectation-maximization algorithm. A main advantage of the proposed joint estimator is that while it has a capability of performing equally well in all scattering environments, it can provide accurate estimates even in high-mobility channel conditions. We also demonstrate how the complexity of the estimator can be significantly reduced, while only slightly trading off performance, by applying the mean field approximation technique. Moreover, we derive a fully adaptive joint synchronization and channel-estimation scheme, as well as a novel Kalman-smoother-based frequency-error detector that can be used in feedback frequency-recovery schemes and is particularly well suited for fast-fading channel conditions. Finally, we revisit the Cramer-Rao lower bound analysis, and show how the Fisher information matrix can be conveniently computed in the presence of a frequency-selective Rayleigh fading channel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207