MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sedimentation and Basin Evolution of the Oligocene-Miocene Mesohellenic Basin, Greece

2002· article· en· W2111806326 on OpenAlexaff
Avraam Zelilidis, David J. W. Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesOutcropPaleontologyStructural basinSedimentary depositional environmentOverbankForeland basinGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Oligocene-Miocene Mesohellenic basin of northern Greece and southern Albania is filled with up to 4 km of marine turbidites and basin margin strata. Surface outcrops include fan deltas, prodeltaic facies, and sandy and shaly submarine fan facies. All these facies in outcrop can be directly correlated with seismic facies in the subsurface, which in turn are compared with seismic facies in modern sandy submarine fans. Twelve seismic markers provide a stratigraphic framework that has been dated by new nannofossil biostratigraphy. Lowstand facies include erosional channels on the basin slope that aggrade basinward with sandy overbank levees to give composite sand bodies with an overall lobelike character. Distally, these pass into sandy channel-termination depositional lobes. Highstand facies are characterized by shaly basin slopes and shaly turbidites in the basin, with irregular reflections interpreted to represent shallow channels and slumps. The stratigraphic occurrence of lowstand facies compares closely with published eustatic sea level curves. The basin has the potential for significant gas, principally in stratigraphic traps. The Mesohellenic basin developed as a strike-slip half graben, synchronous with the Ionian foreland basin to the west of a mountain belt formed by the Pindos nappes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207