MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111874994 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs079

The multidimensional role of calcium in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities

2012· review· en· W2111874994 on OpenAlexafffund
Stanley Nattel, Dobromir Dobrev

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineAfterdepolarizationAtrial fibrillationPathophysiologyCardiac arrhythmiaNeurosciencePopulationMechanism (biology)BioinformaticsCardiologyInternal medicineElectrophysiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing with the ageing of the population. Presently available treatment options are far from optimal and new insights into underlying mechanisms are needed to improve therapy. A variety of recent lines of research are converging to reveal important and relatively underappreciated multidimensional roles of cellular Ca(2+) content, distribution, and handling in AF pathophysiology. The objective of the present paper is to review the participation of changes in cell Ca(2+) and related processes in the mechanisms that lead to AF initiation and maintenance, and to consider the relevance of new knowledge in this area to therapeutic innovation. We first review the involvement of Ca(2+)-related functions in the principal arrhythmia mechanisms underlying AF: focal ectopic activity due to afterdepolarizations and re-entrant mechanisms. The detailed molecular pathophysiology of focal ectopic and re-entrant activity is then discussed in relationship to the participation of cell Ca(2+) changes and related Ca(2+)-handling and Ca(2+)-sensitive signalling systems. We then go on to consider the participation of Ca(2+)-related functions in electrical and structural remodelling processes leading to the AF substrate. Finally, we consider the implications for development of new arrhythmia management approaches and future research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations202
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207