Characterization and Identification of Epididymal Factors That Protect Ejaculated Bovine Sperm During In Vitro Storage1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of secretory epididymal factors on sperm survival and storage in bovine cauda epididymides is poorly understood. Thus, the effects of bovine epididymal epithelium fluid (BEEF) on frozen-thawed bovine sperm motility have been evaluated in vitro. Sperm motion parameters were assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis. Compared with serum bovine proteins, BEEF efficiently sustained bovine sperm motility after a 6-h incubation period. The positive effect of BEEF on sperm motility was even more apparent using a fractionated BEEF extract (>10 kDa, 2 mg/ml). This beneficial effect was abolished when the BEEF active fraction was heat treated before incubation. A minimal 2-h BEEF preincubation period was necessary to maintain sperm motility activity and to protect sperm against oxidative injury caused by 150 microM hydrogen peroxide. The proteins from the BEEF >10-kDa fractions were biotinylated to identify the proteins that bind to the sperm surface. Five specific sperm-surface-binding proteins were revealed by Western blot analysis probed with avidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate. These proteins were digested with trypsin for identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight peptide mass spectrometric analyzer. Under reducing conditions, 5 bovine proteins were identified: the beta (36-kDa spot) and alpha (38-kDa spot) chains of clusterin, the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 (48-kDa spot), and the antithrombin-III and the fibrinogen gamma-B chains, both corresponding to a doublet of about 50-52 kDa. These proteins are known to be present at the sperm surface in other species and could play a role in sperm protection in vivo. These results provide new insights to explain how secretory epididymal proteins sustain sperm motility during storage in vitro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".