High-resolution R-banding at the 1250-band level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-resolution human chromosomes were obtained from lymphocytes after thymidine synchronization. The block was released either with thymidine to produce GTG (G-bands by trypsin using Giemsa) and RHG (R-bands by heating using Giemsa) banding or with BrdU (5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine) for RBG (R-bands by BrdU using Giemsa) banding. RHG and RBG band patterns are only 75 to 85% congruent. The dissimilarities increase with the band number per genome and vary from one chromosome region to another. After high-resolution RBG banding, the BrdU-substituted bands show an unequal condensation delay, which can be, according to the bands involved, very important, minimal, or even absent. The bands showing the highest degree of condensation delay are the bands replicating the latest. The GTG- and RHG-band patterns show complementary matching for about 90% of the bands. It was found that two third of the chromosome surface appears positively stained after R-banding. This suggests that more DNA is replicated during early S-phase than during late S-phase. To obtain a fully developed RBG-band pattern in 90 to 95% of harvested mitoses, a period of 4.5 hours after the removal of the blocking agent is optimal. Such a brief release period also implies that late S-phase is much shorter than early S-phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".