Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanosensors for Copper(II) Based on Bis(rhodamine)‐Derived PMOs with J‐Type Aggregates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using pentyl-linked bis(rhodamine)-derived tetra-siloxane (PRh-Si4 ) as the organosilica precursor, highly ordered PRh-bridged periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PRhPMOs) were prepared. When excited at λ=500 nm, the PRhPMO suspension that contained metal ions showed two separate emission peaks at λ=550 and 623 nm. The first peak, located at λ=550 nm, was due to ring-opening of the spiro structure in the rhodamine moiety and the second, located at λ=623 nm, originated from fluorescent aggregates of the PRh units embedded in the silica framework of the PRhPMO. By using the different intensity ratios of the two fluorescence signals (FI550/623), PRhPMOs could be used as turn-ON type fluorescent ratiometric chemosensors for Cu(2+). Furthermore, based on the single-exciton theory, it was deduced that the fluorescent aggregates formed were of the J-type and had a coplanar configuration. Consequently, PRhPMOs display a longer fluorescence lifetime and greater fluorescent quantum yield than the respective monomers dissolved in solution, which is consistent with the experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".