MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111986245 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n1p137

Metals Accumulation in grey mangrove (Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh.) inhabiting Tarut Bay, Eastern Saudi Arabia

2013· article· en· W2111986245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanan Almahasheer, Wafa’a A. Al-Taisan, M. K. Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvicennia marinaMangroveBayAvicenniaHeavy metalsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryEcologyGeologyBiologyChemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mangrove forests are of special interest because of their metal accumulation potenials as they occur in environments characterized by an excess of toxic ions. In this current study, we investigated the accumulation capacity of (Avicennia marina), a dominant mangrove plant inhabiting Tarut Bay in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Samples comprising mangroves, water and soil from 10 locations of Tarut Bay were analyzed for 8 heavy metals including Boron, Iron, Manganese, Zink, Lead, Nickel, Cadimum and Cupper. In water samples, B (5.5 PPM) was the highest while Cd was absent, also soil samples contained higher B (27.2 PPM), while Cd was lacking in these samples too. Overall, the concentrations of heavy metals were higher in plant shoot as compared to water and soil samples. In plant shoot Cu level was highest (107.22 PPM), while Cd was the lowest in. Our results demonstrate that grey mangrove absorb and accumulate higher quantities of heavy metals and thus play a vital role via cleansing the coastal environment from such harmful heavy metals. Our findings asserted that grey mangrove is a promising candidate for the purpose of Phytostabilization of industrially polluted coastal shores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207