MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2111992052 · doi:10.1109/rawcon.2003.1227881

Spread space-spectrum multiple access

2004· article· en· W2111992052 on OpenAlexaff
B.K. Ng, E.S. Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMIMOBase stationComputer networkTime division multiple accessDecoding methodsRandom accessTransmitterMultiplexingSingle antenna interference cancellationTransmission (telecommunications)Spectral efficiencyChannel (broadcasting)Channel access methodTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsWirelessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper; a new multiple access scheme suitable for the forward link transmission in a multiuser MIMO system is investigated. Unlike traditional MIMO multiple access schemes, which rely on orthogonal-temporal channels (e.g. TDMA), the proposed scheme, namely the spread space-spectrum multiple access (SSSMA), exploits the space-domain for multiuser multiplexing. As its name suggests, SSSMA utilizes the available degrees of freedom offered by the spread-spectrum and those by the multiple transmit antennas to perform multiple access. At the base-station transmitter, each coded data stream corresponding to a unique user-channel is modulated with a user-specific two-dimensional spreading sequence and added together with other channels' modulated signals. At each user's receiver, the multiple-access-interference (MAI) generated from the same base station is mitigated through iterative multiuser detection and decoding. We focus on the performance of SSSMA in two different environments: (1) local point-to-multipoint network such as central access LAN; and (2) a power-controlled cellular system. It is shown that not only does the SSSMA offer near-theoretic-capacity performance in both environments, it is able to exploit a new form of diversity, namely the space-interferers diversity, in an ideal power-controlled network while other MIMO multiple access schemes fail to do so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques→French-language works237,207→