MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112055766 · doi:10.1191/0959683603hl670rp

A modern analogue for plant colonization of palaeotsunami sands in Cascadia, British Columbia, Canada

2003· article· en· W2112055766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan F. Hughes, Rolf W. Mathewes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Holocene · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMarshSalt marshPollenOutcropOceanographyEcologyIntertidal zonePaleontologyWetlandBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sediment stratigraphy of a modern analogue for pioneer-plant colonization of palaeotsunami sands near Tofino, British Columbia, Canada, shows that a sand outcrop is continuous with a buried sand stratum deposited by tsunamis of the ad 1700 Cascadia earthquake. Plants growing on the sand outcrop form a low-marsh community that includes Triglochin maritimum, Salicornia virginica, Spergularia canadensis, Puccinellia pumila and Plantago maritima. In contrast, low marshes on muddy substrates include only Carex lyngbyei. Although Carex lyngbyei colonizes low marsh on mud, it is restricted to middle marsh or higher elevation communities on sand. With two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended corre spondence analysis (DCA), plant cover-abundance clearly distinguishes sandy from muddy low marsh, a finding that suggests that particle size influences plant colonization. TWINSPAN and DCA show that pollen spectra of the sandy marsh surface resemble fossil pollen of sediments that immediately overlie buried sand deposits. Grain size of intertidal deposits influences primary plant succession, and species on sand respond to relative sea-level change just as those on mud. Pollen assemblages in surface sediments reflect plants growing nearby, and taphonomic distortion of the pollen spectrum is minimal at this locality. These observations suggest that past co-seismic subsidence can be estimated by use of pollen assemblages as proxy indicators of elevation relative to sea level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HoloceneSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207