Mapping Genes to Chicken Microchromosome 16 and Discovery of Olfactory and Scavenger Receptor Genes Near the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trisomy mapping is a powerful method for assigning genes to chicken microchromosome 16 (GGA 16). The single chicken nucleolar organizer region (NOR), the 2 major histocompatibility complex regions (MHC-Y and MHC-B), and CD1 genes were all previously assigned to GGA 16 using trisomy mapping. Here, we combined array comparative genomic hybridization with trisomy mapping to screen unassigned genomic scaffolds (consigned temporarily to chrUn_random) for sequences originating from GGA 16. A number of scaffolds mapped to GGA 16. Among these were scaffolds that contain genes for olfactory (OR) and cysteine-rich domain scavenger (SRCR) receptors, along with a number of genes that encode putative immunoglobulin-like receptors and other molecules. We used high-resolution cytogenomic analyses to confirm assignment of OR and SRCR genes to GGA 16 and to pinpoint members of these gene families to the q-arm in partially overlapping regions between the centromere and the NOR. Southern blots revealed sequence polymorphism within the OR/SRCR region and linkage with the MHC-Y region, thereby providing evidence for conserved linkage between OR genes and the MHC within birds. This work localizes OR genes to the vicinity of the chicken MHC and assigns additional genes, including immune defense genes, to GGA 16.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".