MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112132879 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n1p110

Heavy Metals Contents in Ziziphus Tree Leaves Under the Effect of Different Industrial Activities

2013· article· en· W2112132879 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Abdulraheem Shaheen, Fathy El‐Nakhlawy, Fahd Mosalam Almehmadi, Abdulmohsin Rajeh Al-Shareef

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of JeddahKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsZiziphusNutrientMineralization (soil science)ChemistryPollutantHorticultureBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effects of 3 industrial activities on the concentrations of toxic metals (Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb) and micro-nutrients elements (Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn) in the leaves of 2 and 4 years old Ziziphus trees grown closed to these industrial areas were studied during March 2013. The highest Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb concentrations in the Ziziphus leaves were found in the trees closed the paints, chemical and paper industrial sectors with values of 4.56, 8.69, 6.15 and 48.47 mg/kg, respectively, while the trees in the control area had 1.09, 1.16, 1.34 and 6.27 mg/kg, respectively. The sector of mineralization, plastic and building materials was the highest in Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn emission pollutants accumulated and absorped by the tree leaves. The 4-years old tree leaves were significantly higher than the 2-years old tree in all studied toxic and micro-nutrients elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207