MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112228502 · doi:10.1517/13543784.12.1.87

Therapeutic potential of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

2003· article· en· W2112228502 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel J. Drucker

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncretinDipeptidyl peptidaseAminopeptidasePeptideGlucagon-like peptide-1Dipeptidyl peptidase-4Type 2 diabetesSitagliptinChemistryPharmacologyBiochemistryEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyDiabetes mellitusMedicineEnzymeAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incretins are peptide hormones, exemplified by glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 that are released from the gut in response to nutrient ingestion and enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Incretin action is terminated due to N-terminal cleavage of the peptides by the aminopeptidase dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV). Hence, inhibition of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 degradation via reduction of DPP-IV activity represents an innovative strategy for enhancing incretin action in vivo. This review summarises the biology of incretin action, the structure, expression and pleiotropic biological activities of DPP-IV and provides an overview of the rationale, potential merits and theoretical pitfalls in the development of DPP-IV inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations208
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207