A War Within a War: Canadian Reactions to D. W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’extraordinairement populaire film épique de D.W. Griffith est sorti au Canada en 1915, pendant la guerre. Basé sur le roman et la pièce de théâtre The Clansman de Thomas Dixon, le film adoptait un point de vue pro-sudiste sur la Guerre civile et la période de la reconstruction qui diabolisait les Afro-Américains et les abolitionnistes et encensait le Ku Klux Klan. Le présent article se penche sur les réactions à ce film au Canada en 1915 et en 1916, notamment sur les manifestations organisées par les Afro-Canadiens, généralement sous l’égide de congrégations religieuses. The Birth of a Nation s’est avéré un casse-tête pour les bureaux provinciaux de censure dans un pays supposément réfractaire à la culture de la violence américaine et favorable au « fair-play » britannique. Au cours de la guerre, les Afro-Canadiens ont fait appel aux sens de la citoyenneté, du patriotisme et de l’esprit britannique pour organiser une lutte rapide, quoique vaine, en faveur des droits civiques et à l’encontre d’un produit culturel américain envahissant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.069 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".