MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112256909 · doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2164

The Early Natural History of Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetes

2005· article· en· W2112256909 on OpenAlexafffund
Julia Steinke, Alan R. Sinaiko, Michael S. Kramer, Samy Suissa, Blanche M. Chavers, Michael Mauer

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMicroalbuminuriaRenal functionMedicineDiabetic nephropathyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesNephropathyBlood pressureUrologyExcretionProspective cohort studyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predictors of albumin excretion rate (AER) abnormalities could provide earlier indicators of diabetic nephropathy risk. Data from the Natural History Study, a prospective 5-year observation of renal structure and function in young type 1 diabetic patients, were examined for predictors of AER patterns in normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients. Included were 170 patients (96 females) (aged 16.7 +/- 5.9 years, duration of diabetes 8.0 +/- 4.3 years) with normal blood pressure, normoalbuminuria (AER <20 microg/min), and eight or more follow-up visits over 5 years. AER, blood pressure, and HbA1c (A1C) were determined quarterly and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) annually. Persistent microalbuminuria (PMA) was defined as 20-200 microg/min in two of three consecutive values within 6-12 months. Four different AER patterns were identified. Group 1 (n = 99): all values <20 microg/min. Group 2 (n = 49): intermittent levels >20 microg/min but not meeting microalbuminuria criteria. Group 3 (n = 14): PMA during follow-up but normoalbuminuria at study exit. Group 4 (n = 8): microalbuminuria at study exit. Group 4 (497 +/- 95 nm, P < 0.01) and group 3 (464 +/- 113 nm, P = 0.03) patients had greater baseline glomerular basement membrane (GBM) width versus group 1 (418 +/- 67 nm). Baseline GFR in group 4 (163 +/- 37 ml.min(-1). 1.73 m(-2)) was higher than group 1 (143 +/- 28 ml.min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2), P = 0.04). A1C was higher in group 2 (9.0 +/- 1.2%) than group 1 (8.4 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.008). Thus, greater increases in GBM width and GFR were predictors of PMA. Since 64% of the patients that developed microalbuminuria reverted to normoalbuminuria, the risk of diabetic nephropathy as defined by current microalbuminuria criteria is unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations190
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesFrench-language works237,207