MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2112258617 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.131109

Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Does It Matter If RA Is Diagnosed in Early or Late Age?

2013· letter· en· W2112258617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kimberly P. Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisDyslipidemiaInternal medicineImmunosenescenceDiabetes mellitusDiseaseAge of onsetPopulationRisk factorArthritisObesityImmunologyPediatricsImmune systemEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex autoimmune disorder with heterogeneous clinical presentations, including age at disease onset. Indeed, RA can be diagnosed at any age. Although the peak age of onset is between 50 and 75 years, the prevalence of RA in females over age 65 is up to 5%1. Given the prevalence of RA is about 1% in whites2, there is a substantial subgroup of RA patients who are elderly (over age 65) at disease onset. There are over 50 countries with current life expectancies of 75 years or older3. Hence, the risk of morbidity and mortality even in the subgroup of elderly-onset RA patients is of clinical relevance. The approximately 2 to 3-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in RA is well-established4,5,6. It is suggested that both traditional CV risk factors as well as RA-specific disease mechanisms (e.g., systemic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and premature immunosenescence) contribute to the overall CV risk in RA. However, few studies have examined the risks and determinants of CVD in subgroups of RA patients depending on their age at diagnosis. In a previous population-based study6, it was shown that the 10-year absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk in given age groups varied substantially according to the presence of CV risk factors; among 60 to 69-year-old RA patients with no risk factors, the absolute CV risk was only 16.8%, but rose to 60.4% if CV risk factors of smoking, hypertension (HTN), dyslipidemia, diabetes, and obesity were present. A recent study by Ajeganova and colleagues in this issue of The Journal 7 complements these findings by examining the effect of early RA disease factors on CV risk, stratified by age at RA disease onset. Their study sought to examine the associations of … Address correspondence to Dr. Liang, University of Pittsburgh, Division of Rheumatology, 3500 Terrace St., BST S723, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. E-mail: liangkp{at}upmc.edu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→