MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112339797 · doi:10.1002/stab.201590106

Glacier Skywalk – Aussichtsbrücke mit Glasboden

2015· article· de· W2112339797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Schmitt, Stefan Zimmermann, Simon Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueStahlbau · 2015
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlacierGeologyCliffGeomorphologyArchaeologyTidewater glacier cycleHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Inmitten des Jasper National Parks in den Rocky Mountains von Kanada wurde im Wettlauf mit den Witterungsbedingungen 2013 eine neue Besucherattraktion mit dem Glacier Discovery Walk errichtet. Das Touristenunternehmen Brewster Travel Kanada beauftragte die Errichtung eines neuen Natur‐Erlebniswegs der im Glacier Skywalk endet. Dieser bietet dem Besucher das einmalige Erlebnis auf einem Glasboden in 280 m Höhe über dem Sunwapta Tal die umliegenden Gletscher barrierefrei zu besichtigen. In Rekordzeit wurde die Planung, Fertigung, Transport aus Deutschland und Montage bewältigt. Dabei gab es neue Überlegungen zur Ausführung der Stahlmontage, Glasbodenaufbau und Gestaltung der Brüstungsgläser unter Berücksichtigung von Windkanaluntersuchungen. Glacier Skywalk – Glass‐floored Observation Platform. At Jasper National Park in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, a stunning new tourist attraction, the Glacier Skywalk, was constructed in 2013 in a race against the Canadian winter. The cliff‐edge walkway, which ends in the Glacier Skywalk is owned and operated by the tourist company Brewster Travel Canada. 280 m above the Sunwapta Valley, the barrier‐free glass‐floored skywalk offers visitors an exhilarating panoramic view on the surrounding mountains, glaciers and into the glacier‐carved valleys. Within a 6 month period, the planning, manufacturing and supply from Germany as well as the installation procedure on site was finalized. During this time, additional considerations regarding the steel installation, glass floor body and the incorporation of the glass wind deflectors had to be taken into account.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStahlbauSame topicCivil and Structural Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207