MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112341789 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.140387

Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE): 2014 update

2014· article· en· W2112341789 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sheldon W. Tobe, James A. Stone, Kimberly M. Walker, Todd J. Anderson, Onil Bhattacharyya, Alice Cheng, Jean‐Claude Grégoire, Gord Gubitz, Mary R. L’Abbé, David C.W. Lau, Lawrence A. Leiter, Paul Oh, Raj Padwal, Luc Poirier, Peter Selby, Mark S. Tremblay, Richard Ward, Diane Hua, Peter P. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecWomen's College HospitalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalMontreal Heart InstituteChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity Health NetworkCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthToronto Rehabilitation InstituteSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic diseaseMedicineDiseaseRisk factorPopulation ageingHealth carePopulationEnvironmental healthGerontologyFamily medicineEconomic growthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, the multiple chronic conditions and cardiovascular risk factors of our aging population continue to challenge health care providers and burden health systems. Cardiovascular disease is a major contributor to chronic illness, with four in five Canadians having at least one risk factor for

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0100.015
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207