MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112375377 · doi:10.1139/p07-179

An overview of EBIT data needed for experiments on laser-producedplasmas

2008· article· en· W2112375377 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. B. Schneider, Roberto Mancini, K. Widmann, K. B. Fournier, G. V. Brown, H. A. Baldis, K. V. Cone, Stephanie B. Hansen, M. J. May, D. B. Thorn, P. Beiersdörfer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron beam ion trapPhysicsAtomic physicsSpectral lineHohlraumIonPlasmaArgonInertial confinement fusionLaserWavelengthElectronOpticsNuclear physicsCathode ray

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data produced by an electron beam ion trap (EBIT) can be crucial for interpreting spectra from plasmas created by long-pulse lasers. Four example spectra are considered: (i) the spectra from the hot gold plasma in the laser deposition region of a hot hohlraum, (ii) the He-β spectra from an argon-doped imploding core of an inertial confinement fusion capsule, (iii) the polarization in spectral lines produced by hot electrons generated by laser-plasma parametric instabilities, and (iv) the spectra of the underdense plasma from an aerogel X-ray source. The EBIT data needed for these cases are: (i) the line positions for 3 → 2 transitions in open M shell gold ions, (ii) the Li-like satellite lines for the K-β transition in open L shell argon ions, (iii) the polarization of suitable X-ray lines at 30 keV, and (iv) the precise wavelengths of K lines of highly charged Si ions and the precise wavelengths of L and K lines of highly charged Ge ions.PACS Nos.: 52.25.Os, 52.38.–4, 52.38.Bv, 52.57.–z, 52.57.Fg, 52.59.Px, 52.70.–m 52.70.La

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207