Efficacy of a Portable Oxygen Concentrator with Pulsed Delivery for Treatment of Hypoxemia During Anesthesia of Wildlife
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portable battery-driven oxygen concentrators provide an alternative to the use of oxygen cylinders for treatment of hypoxemia during field anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the EverGo Portable Oxygen Concentrator (Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania 15668, USA) with pulse-dose delivery for improvement of arterial oxygenation during anesthesia of wildlife. This concentrator delivers oxygen in a pulsed flow with pulse volumes from 12 to 70 ml, up to a maximum capacity of 1.05 L/min. The pulse-dose setting shall be adjusted according to the respiratory rate of the animal, e.g., setting 6 for a respiratory rate < or = 15/min. The study included 16 free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos), 18 free-ranging bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and five captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Oxygen was administered via two nasal lines that were inserted through the nostrils to the level of the medial canthus of the eyes. Arterial blood samples were collected before, during, and after oxygen therapy and immediately analyzed. When providing oxygen from the portable concentrator, the arterial oxygenation markedly improved in all brown bears and some reindeer, whereas no or minor improvement was seen in the bighorn sheep. The mean +/- SD (range) PaO2 during oxygen supplementation was 134 +/- 29 (90-185) mmHg in the brown bears, 52 +/- 11 (32-67) mmHg in the bighorn sheep, and 79 +/- 19 (61-110) mmHg in the reindeer. The efficacy of the evaluated method may be influenced by ambient temperature, altitude, pulse-dose setting on the concentrator, the animal's respiratory rate, and species-specific physiology during anesthesia. Advantages of the portable oxygen concentrator included small size and low weight, ease of operate, and rechargeablity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".