Both AT<sub>1</sub>and AT<sub>2</sub>receptors mediate proliferation and migration of porcine vascular smooth muscle cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiotensin receptor antagonists have shown clinical promise in modulating vascular disease, in part by limiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The majority of studies examining the contribution of these receptors have been undertaken in cells derived from rat aorta, which primarily express the ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor. This investigation studied the relative contribution of AT(1) and ANG II type 2 (AT(2)) receptors to the mitogenic program of porcine smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle cells were derived from porcine coronary artery explants. The presence of both AT(1) and AT(2) receptors was demonstrated through ligand binding and RT-PCR analysis. Biochemical and cellular markers of proliferation were monitored in the presence of selective receptor antagonists. Smooth muscle cell migration was measured using both wound healing and Boyden chamber migration assays. Visualization of the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in growing and quiescent porcine smooth muscle cells with epifluorescence microscopy demonstrated that their subcellular distribution varied with growth state. An examination with several growth assays revealed that both AT(1)-specific losartan and AT(2)-specific PD-123319 receptor antagonists inhibited ANG II-stimulated RNA and DNA synthesis, PCNA expression, and hyperplasia. ANG II induced both directional and nondirectional cell migration. AT(1) receptor antagonist treatment significantly decreased ANG II-induced directional migration only, whereas AT(2) receptor antagonist treatment significantly reduced both modes of migration. Interestingly, the focal adhesion kinase inhibitor PF-573228 also blocked migration but not proliferation. Furthermore, focal adhesion kinase activation in response to ANG II was prevented only by PD-123319, indicating that this activation is downstream of the AT(2) receptor. The observed role of the AT(2) receptor in ANG II-induced migration was confirmed with smooth muscle cells depleted of the AT(2) receptor with short hairpin RNA treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".