MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112552755 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00431.2010

Both AT<sub>1</sub>and AT<sub>2</sub>receptors mediate proliferation and migration of porcine vascular smooth muscle cells

2011· article· en· W2112552755 on OpenAlexaff
Sherif Louis, Laura Saward, Peter Zahradka

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular smooth muscleReceptorCell biologyChemistrySmooth muscleCell growthBiophysicsBiologyEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiotensin receptor antagonists have shown clinical promise in modulating vascular disease, in part by limiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The majority of studies examining the contribution of these receptors have been undertaken in cells derived from rat aorta, which primarily express the ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor. This investigation studied the relative contribution of AT(1) and ANG II type 2 (AT(2)) receptors to the mitogenic program of porcine smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle cells were derived from porcine coronary artery explants. The presence of both AT(1) and AT(2) receptors was demonstrated through ligand binding and RT-PCR analysis. Biochemical and cellular markers of proliferation were monitored in the presence of selective receptor antagonists. Smooth muscle cell migration was measured using both wound healing and Boyden chamber migration assays. Visualization of the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in growing and quiescent porcine smooth muscle cells with epifluorescence microscopy demonstrated that their subcellular distribution varied with growth state. An examination with several growth assays revealed that both AT(1)-specific losartan and AT(2)-specific PD-123319 receptor antagonists inhibited ANG II-stimulated RNA and DNA synthesis, PCNA expression, and hyperplasia. ANG II induced both directional and nondirectional cell migration. AT(1) receptor antagonist treatment significantly decreased ANG II-induced directional migration only, whereas AT(2) receptor antagonist treatment significantly reduced both modes of migration. Interestingly, the focal adhesion kinase inhibitor PF-573228 also blocked migration but not proliferation. Furthermore, focal adhesion kinase activation in response to ANG II was prevented only by PD-123319, indicating that this activation is downstream of the AT(2) receptor. The observed role of the AT(2) receptor in ANG II-induced migration was confirmed with smooth muscle cells depleted of the AT(2) receptor with short hairpin RNA treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207