In vitro generation of T lymphocytes from embryonic stem cell–derived prehematopoietic progenitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Embryonic stem (ES) cells can differentiate into most blood cells in vitro, providing a powerful model system to study hematopoiesis. However, ES cell-derived T lymphocytes have not been generated in vitro, and it was unresolved whether such potential is absent or merely difficult to isolate. Because the latter case might result from rapid commitment to non-T-cell fates, we isolated ES cell-derived prehematopoietic precursors for reconstitution of fetal thymic organ cultures. We found a transient Flk1+CD45- subset of these precursors generated T lymphocytes in vitro, and the use of reaggregate thymic organ cultures greatly enhanced reconstitution frequency. These findings reveal that ES cells can exhibit in vitro T-cell potential, but this is restricted to early stages of ES cell differentiation. Moreover, the results support the notion that the thymic microenvironment can induce T-cell differentiation from a subset of prehematopoietic progenitors and suggest deficient migration into intact thymi hindered previous attempts to generate T cells in vitro from ES cell-derived progenitors. These findings demonstrate that a defined subset of ES cells has the potential to generate T cells in vitro and could contribute to greater understanding of the molecular events of hematopoietic induction and T-cell lineage commitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".