MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112647076 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2012.0627

Secondary user access based on stochastic link estimation in cognitive radio with fibre‐connected distributed antennas

2013· article· en· W2112647076 on OpenAlexaff
Wendong Ge, Hong Ji, Xi Li, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Youth Science Foundation
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceLink (geometry)Stochastic geometryEstimationComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors consider the application of a system architecture called cognitive radio (CR) with fibre‐connected distributed antennas in IEEE 802.22 wireless regional area networks (WRANs) as it could bring the benefits of much shorter wireless transmission distances, lower transmission power and the possibility of utilising multi‐antenna transmission techniques. In this architecture, the authors study the secondary user (SU) access problem in uplink, where the SU to primary user (PU) link estimation is subject to random errors because PU could not assist link estimation of SU. This SU access problem is divided into two parts: antenna selection and access control. Thus, first antenna selection problem is modelled as a restless bandit problem, which is solved by the primal‐dual index heuristic algorithm based on first order relaxation. In addition, the access control problem is modelled as a stochastic knapsack (SASK) problem with random weight, and then relaxed to be a deterministic second order cone programming problem. With the deduced upper bound, the access control problem is solved by the branch and bound algorithm, which yields the SU access based on SASK scheme. Simulation results illustrate the significant performance improvement of SASK scheme, compared with existing SU access methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207