BOUNDED-VELOCITY APPROXIMATION OF MOBILE EUCLIDEAN 2-CENTRES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given a set P of points (clients) in the plane, a Euclidean 2-centre of P is a set of two points (facilities) in the plane such that the maximum distance from any client to its nearest facility is minimized. Geometrically, a Euclidean 2-centre of P corresponds to a cover of P by two discs of minimum radius r (the Euclidean 2-radius). Given a set of mobile clients, where each client follows a continuous trajectory in the plane with bounded velocity, the motion of the corresponding mobile Euclidean 2-centre is not necessarily continuous. Consequently, we consider strategies for defining the trajectories of a pair of mobile facilities that guarantee a fixed-degree approximation of the Euclidean 2-centre while maintaining bounded relative velocity. In an attempt to balance the conflicting goals of closeness of approximation and a low maximum relative velocity, we introduce reflection-based 2-centre functions by reflecting the position of a mobile client across the mobile Steiner centre and the mobile rectilinear 1-centre, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".