Quantifying the influence of live crown ratio on the mechanical properties of clear wood
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conceptual models of wood formation suggest that trees with large crowns produce wood with reduced mechanical properties due to enhanced auxin production, but few studies have explicitly examined the relationship between crown dimensions and wood properties. Using white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) trees harvested from spacing and thinning trials in central Ontario, Canada, this study examines how live crown ratio influences the strength and stiffness of wood. Modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) were measured by conducting three-point bending tests on small (150 × 10 × 10 mm) defect-free samples selected from different radial positions at three heights within the stems. MOR and MOE were strongly and positively related to cambial age, and also increased slightly with sampling height. In addition, MOR showed a significant decrease with increasing live crown ratio – calculated as the ratio of crown length to tree height – in both the spacing and the thinning trials. However, MOE decreased significantly with live crown ratio only in the spacing trial, where the younger trees had a larger range of crown ratios. These results provide tentative support for models of wood formation that link wood quality with crown development, suggesting that crown metrics could be used to predict wood properties before harvest, but doing so may be problematic in mature stands that exhibit less variability in crown dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it