MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112757363 · doi:10.1002/aic.10902

The sedimentation of papermaking fibers

2006· article· en· W2112757363 on OpenAlexafffund
Edmond W. K. Young, D. Mark Martinez, James A. Olson, K. Buckley, Salma Jivan, T.J. Ruth, Vesna Sossi

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMF
KeywordsPapermakingSettlingSuspension (topology)Pulp (tooth)Materials sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)MechanicsComposite materialChromatographyChemistryChemical engineeringThermodynamicsMathematicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The motion of 18 F radioactively labeled papermaking fibers settling in the midst of a suspension of nonradioactive fibers has been studied using positron emission tomography (PET). Various fractions were separated from the whole‐pulp suspension, radioactively labeled, and reintroduced into the original suspension. Tracer concentration profiles were measured dynamically throughout the sedimenting structure over the first 2 h of settling. These profiles were then used in conjunction with the Eulerian volume‐averaged two‐phase flow equations to estimate the permeability and solid‐phase stress functions for this suspension. Good agreement was found between the experimental data and the numerical model using particular functional forms for permeability and solid stress. The general approach outlined here can be used to examine the networking characteristics of different mixed suspensions of fibers. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207