Association amacrine cells of Ramón y Cajal: Rediscovery and reinterpretation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1895, by means of the Golgi method, Santiago Ramón y Cajal discovered a cell having a unique morphology in the avian retina. This cell had its cell body in the amacrine cell level of the inner nuclear layer, only a few rudimentary dendrites at the outermost level of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), and a long axon coursing horizontally and terminating in the IPL. Despite having defined amacrine cells as cells without axons, Cajal named this cell type "association amacrine cell" (AAC). This discovery was not confirmed by other investigators for nearly a century. Very recently, however, isthmo-optic target cells (IOTCs), which receive the terminals of centrifugal fibers emanating from the isthmo-optic nucleus, have been identified as one type of AAC. As summarized and discussed in this review, the morphology of the AACs as described by Cajal has been completely confirmed. However, since these cells appear to be classical polarized, monoaxonal neurons and lack the dendritic interactions that are typical of amacrine cells, they should be regarded as a distinct type of retinal interneuron and not as amacrine cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".