MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112775309 · doi:10.1002/aic.13891

Mixing induced by buoyancy‐driven flows in porous media

2012· article· en· W2112775309 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamid Emami Meybodi, Hassan Hassanzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsMechanicsBuoyancyLaminar flowMixing (physics)Steady state (chemistry)Porous mediumFlow (mathematics)Dispersion (optics)Transient (computer programming)ConvectionThermodynamicsPhysicsMaterials sciencePorosityChemistryOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical model for fluid mixing in steady and transient buoyancy‐driven flows induced by laminar natural convection in porous layers is presented. This problem follows a highly nonlinear dynamics and its accurate modeling poses numerical challenges. Based on the Taylor dispersion theory, a one‐dimensional analytical model is developed for steady and transient velocity fields. To investigate steady‐state mixing, a unicellular steady velocity field is established by maintaining a thermal gradient across a porous layer of finite thickness. A passive tracer is then introduced into the flow field and the mixing process is studied. In the case of transient flows, as the convective flow grows and decays with time the behavior of the dispersion coefficient is characterized by a four‐parameter Weibull function. The simple analytical model developed here can recover scaling relations that have been reported in the literature to characterize the mixing process in steady and transient buoyancy‐driven flows. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 1378–1389, 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207