Effect of prophylactic transfusion of stored RBCs on oxygen reserve in response to acute isovolemic hemorrhage in a rodent model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The storage of RBCs results in a time-related decline in 2,3 DPG that may reduce the ability to unload oxygen (O(2)) to tissue. The objective of this study was to compare the effect that transfusion of stored 2,3 DPG-depleted rat blood (7 days in CPDA-1) had on the O(2) reserve in conscious rats, with that of the transfusion of fresh blood (<2-hour storage). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Anemic rats (Hb, 80 g/L) received either fresh packed RBCs or stored RBCs to raise Hb levels to 140 g per L. They then underwent isovolemic hemorrhage mimicking surgical blood loss to the point of O(2) supply dependency (OSD). Critical O(2) delivery (DO(2)crit), Hb concentration, and O(2) extraction at OSD were measured in a metabolic chamber. RESULTS: After transfusion, RBC DPG decreased by 50 percent in the stored-blood group, and the p50 value decreased by 5 mmHg (32.1 +/- 2.5 mmHg vs. 37.5 +/- 3.0). DO(2)crit was similar in the two groups (fresh blood: 2.79 +/- 0.44 mL/min x g(-1); stored blood, 2.99 +/- 0.76 mL/min x g(-1)). The critical Hb concentration at DO(2)crit was higher in the stored-blood group (44 +/- 4 g/L) than in the fresh-blood group (38 +/- 5 g/L); the cardiac index and O(2) extraction ratio in the two groups were not different. Under conditions of severe normovolemic anemia in rats, depletion of DPG and a decrease in p50 had only minor effects on the O(2) reserve. At OSD, under these conditions, O(2) consumption is not limited by diffusion. CONCLUSION: The physiologic impact of DPG depletion in transfused stored blood on oxygen availability in normal rats appears to be small and may be clinically inconsequential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".