Effect of immunization of hamsters against recombinant P26h on fertility rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the various contraceptive methods available, an effective and inexpensive method remains to be established. Immunocontraception may help to achieve this goal. P26h has been proposed as a candidate for the development of a male contraceptive vaccine. P26h, a hamster sperm protein, interacts with the zona pellucida. Furthermore, in vivo fertilization can be blocked completely by active immunization of male hamsters against P26h. Maltose binding protein (MBP)-P26 shares antigenic determinants with the native P26h present on cauda epididymal spermatozoa. The aim of the present study was to reproduce the immunocontraceptive properties of native P26h by immunizing male hamsters against a recombinant P26h fused with a maltose binding protein (MBP). Active immunization of male hamsters with the MBP-P26h showed that specific anti-P26h circulating IgGs could be generated. Mating of immunized male hamsters with superovulated females resulted in a significant decrease, 20-25%, in the fertilization rate. This result is in agreement with results from in vitro sperm-zona pellucida binding assays. Indeed, the anti-recombinant P26h IgGs showed lower inhibitory properties when compared with anti-native P26h IgG. Despite the high anti-P26h IgG titres generated in hamsters, histological studies showed that active immunization has no pathological sequelae to the reproductive tissues. The potential of P26h as a candidate for a contraceptive vaccine is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".