Osteotomy Healing in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta Receiving Bisphosphonate Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A decade ago our group had reported that osteotomy healing was commonly delayed in children with moderate to severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) who were treated with intravenous pamidronate infusions. We subsequently maintained a bisphosphonate infusion-free interval of 4 months after osteotomy and changed the surgical approach (use of an osteotome instead of a power saw). In addition, zoledronic acid has become the standard intravenous bisphosphonate for treatment of OI at our institution. In the present study, we compared osteotomy healing before and after these changes were instituted. We evaluated bone healing post-osteotomy on standard radiographs after 261 intramedullary rodding procedures involving osteotomies (139 femur, 112 tibia) in 110 patients (age at surgery 1.2 to 20.4 years). Delayed healing was diagnosed when the osteotomy line was visible 12 months after the event. We observed delayed bone healing after 48 of the 114 osteotomies (42%) performed with the new approach, and in 106 of the 147 osteotomies (72%) using the previous approach (p = 0.001). The odds for delayed osteotomy healing were significantly lower with the new approach even after adjustment for age, sex, height Z-score, weight Z-score, OI type, and bone involved (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.47). Thus, delayed osteotomy healing occurred less frequently in the past 10 years than in the decade before that. It is likely that this improved result is attributable to the implemented changes in both medical and surgical management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".