MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113140571 · doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm035

The impact of sea ice on the initiation of the spring bloom on the Newfoundland and Labrador Shelves

2007· article· en· W2113140571 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yongsheng Wu, Ingrid Peterson, Charles Tang, Trevor Platt, Shubha Sathyendranath, César Fuentes‐Yaco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plankton Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsOceanographySpring bloomBloomSpring (device)Sea iceGeologyAntarctic sea iceAlgal bloomMelt pondMixed layerPhytoplanktonArctic ice packEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between sea ice and the phytoplankton spring bloom over the Newfoundland and Labrador shelves is examined using remotely-sensed chlorophyll data and sea-ice data for the period 1998–2004. A regression analysis between the two data sets shows that the retreat of sea ice precedes the spring bloom, and the inter-annual variation of the spring bloom is closely correlated with the start time of ice retreat. The spring bloom off Canada's east coast usually starts on the eastern Grand Banks. Here, the water properties are strongly influenced by sea ice on the Newfoundland shelves in early spring when accelerated ice melting causes the ice edge to retreat north and the melt water is advected south by the Labrador Current. After the ice retreat, the water on the eastern Grand Banks is rapidly stratified and the mixed layer shallows as a result of surface freshening. The shallow mixed layer promotes phytoplankton growth. The regression analysis also reveals that an early spring bloom or ice retreat tends to prolong the duration of the spring bloom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plankton ResearchSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207