Invariant SPHARM Shape Descriptors for Complex Geometry in MR Region of Interest Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In earlier work, we have shown the importance of including 3D shape characteristics when analyzing regions of interest (ROIs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Spherical harmonics (SPHARM) based ROI shape descriptors were proposed and shown to provide important complementary information to traditionally used simple volumetric ROI measures. In this paper we extend our SPHARM shape parameterization technique by using functions defined on concentric spherical shells. We then propose the use of a novel radial transform to obtain unique features even under independent rotations of the constituting shells. These enhanced features enable the analysis of 3D ROIs with complex topologies including those with possible disconnections (e.g. ventricles). We validate the proposed 3D shape descriptors on synthetic data and demonstrate their sensitivity to subtle shape changes in the presence of inter-subject variability. We also apply our approach to real MRI data and detect significant shape changes in the left and right thalamus in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients when compared against normal volunteers, complementing the observed volumetric changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".