Invariant SPHARM Shape Descriptors for Complex Geometry in MR Region of Interest Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In earlier work, we have shown the importance of including 3D shape characteristics when analyzing regions of interest (ROIs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Spherical harmonics (SPHARM) based ROI shape descriptors were proposed and shown to provide important complementary information to traditionally used simple volumetric ROI measures. In this paper we extend our SPHARM shape parameterization technique by using functions defined on concentric spherical shells. We then propose the use of a novel radial transform to obtain unique features even under independent rotations of the constituting shells. These enhanced features enable the analysis of 3D ROIs with complex topologies including those with possible disconnections (e.g. ventricles). We validate the proposed 3D shape descriptors on synthetic data and demonstrate their sensitivity to subtle shape changes in the presence of inter-subject variability. We also apply our approach to real MRI data and detect significant shape changes in the left and right thalamus in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients when compared against normal volunteers, complementing the observed volumetric changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it