5S ribosomal and <i>U1</i> small nuclear RNA genes: A new linkage type in the genome of a crustacean that has three different tandemly repeated units containing 5S ribosomal DNA sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the 5S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of the isopod crustacean Asellus aquaticus. Using PCR amplification, three different tandemly repeated units containing 5S rDNA were identified. Two of the three sequences were cloned and sequenced. One of them was 1842 bp and presented a 5S rRNA gene and a U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene. This type of linkage had never been observed before. The other repeat consisted of 477 bp and contained only an incomplete 5S rRNA gene lacking the first eight nucleotides and a spacer sequence. The third sequence was 6553 bp long and contained a 5S rRNA gene and the four core histone genes. The PCR products were used as probes in fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments to locate them on chromosomes of A. aquaticus. The possible evolutionary origin of the three repeated units is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".