MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113272706 · doi:10.1093/res/hgl017

antonina harbus and russell poole (edd.). Verbal Encounters: Anglo-Saxon and Old Norse Studies for Roberta Frank. Pp. xii+298 (Toronto Old English Series 13). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005. £48.

2006· article· en· W2113272706 on OpenAlex
Hanneke Wilson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)LiteratureDramaHistoryPoetryClassicsIncarnationStyle (visual arts)PsychologyArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Verbal Encounters is a Festschrift for Roberta Frank; its contents are intended to reflect her academic interests, and its contributors are all her former doctoral students at Toronto; but however generous in its conception, this is a project that is flawed in its execution. Some of the essays are careful pieces of work. Pauline Head, ‘Cennan, “to cause to be born”/“to cause to know”: Incarnation as Revelation in Old English Literature’, explores how Old English authors use the polysemy of cennan to convey the mystery of the Incarnation. In ‘Desipere in loco: Style, Memory and the Teachable Moment’, Carin Ruff looks at grammarians’ occasional verbal playfulness as a didactic device. Dorothy Haines, ‘Courtroom Drama and the Homiletic Monologues of the Vercelli Book’, examines the metaphor of the court of law for the Last Judgement. Karin Olsen, ‘“Him þæs grim lean becom”: The Theme of Infertility in Genesis A ’, is a workmanlike account, but to claim that Noah's drunkenness ‘illustrates that even the virtuous can submit to luxuria’ (p. 135 n. 27) is to confuse the Old English text with patristic tradition: the poet is faithful to the biblical account (ll. 1555–97), as he is again in his treatment of the story of Lot and his daughters (ll. 2600–9), where he appears simply to accept that the daughters’ motive is fear of dying without issue. Intriguingly, the poet describes Lot, a middle-aged man, as blondenfeax: is this a disturbing suggestion of youthful vigour? Robert diNapoli, ‘Odd Characters: Runes in Old English Poetry’, discusses the artistic and cultural implications of Anglo-Saxon poets’ use of runes. In ‘Beardless Wonders: “Gaman vas Sqxu” (The Sex was Great)’ Oren Falk expends much learning and ingenuity to find sexual innuendo of an alarmingly violent and misogynist nature in the exchange of skaldic verses between Gísli and Skeggi in Gísla Saga; if he is right, I have to concede that a squeamish, short-sighted woman working in her study in Oxford is not Gísla Saga's ideal reader. Bernadine McCreesh, ‘Prophetic Dreams and Visions in the Sagas of the Early Icelandic Saints’ shows how the visions and dreams in hagiography are adapted in Icelandic literature. Russell Poole, ‘Claiming Kin Skaldic-Style’, shows how two skalds of the Conversion period, Hallfreðr Óttarsson vandræðaskáld and Sigvatr þórðarson, utilize the parallels between the Christian relationship of godfather to godson or goddaughter and the ancient Scandinavian connection of foster-father and foster-son.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it