Cuidar o futuro. Um programa radical para viver melhor. Comissão independente população e qualidade de vida, presidida por Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, Lisboa, Trinova Editora, 1998
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Comissao- autor deste livro foi criada, entre Dezembro de 1991 e Marco de 1992, sob a egide da Fundacao Rockefeller, reunindo participantes de Organizacoes Internacionais, de Organismos Bilaterais de Desenvolvimento e Ministerios dos Negocios Estrangeiros de varios paises, bem como especialistas internacionais. Presidida por Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, a Comissao integrou 18 membros e 2 conselheiros, suportada num secretariado de 15 elementos.Este livro relatorio, quase ignorado entre nos, apesar da sua qualidade interrogativa e da criatividade das suas propostas, tem por nome Cuidar o Futuro. E surpreendente a sua analise nua e crua que, ferindo a normalidade consentida de um mundo em transicao global, reconstitui no leitor a emocao do possivel. Este reencantamento, esta paixao de estar vivo e de aprender a viver juntos, enfrentando os numeros da nossa miseria (PNUD, 2000) ou a linguagem estetica da fotografia de Sebastiao Salgado, presente nos deslocados- emigrantes- excluidos de milhoes de pessoas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".