The perception of friendship in adults with Down syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measuring the perception of friendship in adults with Down syndrome (DS) has long been a research challenge. While there have been studies investigating the number of friends children with DS have in, the study of how adults with DS view the concept of friendship has been relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of friendship in adults with DS using a visually based scale. METHODS: Sixty-six individuals participated in this study: 22 adults with DS, 22 typical mental age (MA) matched children and 22 typical adults matched for chronological age (CA). We administered a visually based Friendship scale made up of photographs depicting social interactions between individuals or groups. The scale was composed of two parts. In Part 1 participants were shown two photographs and asked to select the photograph that best depicted friends. In Part 2 participants were asked to view one photograph and asked, 'Is it okay for friends to do this?' RESULTS: Adults with DS scored lower on the Friendship scale in comparison with the CA and MA matched groups. Adults with DS made more errors in identifying 'friends' from 'non-friends' but were equally able to distinguish friendly behaviours and actions from non-friendly behaviours as their CA and MA matched peers. Individuals with DS were more likely to incorrectly identify photographs depicting a teacher, or a mother with a child as friends. Actions or behaviours that depicted subtle negative emotions were also incorrectly identified. CONCLUSIONS: These results are an important first step in understanding the perception of friendship and social behaviours related to friendship in adults with DS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".