MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Graduated Pressure Regimen for External Counterpulsation Reduces Mortality and Improves Outcomes in Congestive Heart Failure: A Report From the Cardiomedics External Counterpulsation Patient Registry

2005· article· en· W2113396358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan, Lawrence Santora, Joel Kahn, Norman Abbott, Julius Torelli, Gil Vardi

Bibliographic record

VenueCongestive Heart Failure · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionAnginaRegimenBlood pressurePreloadComorbidityMyocardial infarctionHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

External counterpulsation (ECP) has been shown to increase exercise tolerance and reduce angina episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional (CCSF) class, anginal medication usage, and hospitalizations in refractive CCSF class III and IV stable angina. However, the high pressures and resulting 1.5:1-2:1 peak diastolic to peak systolic pressure (D/S) ratios shown to be optimal in the treatment of angina can cause excessive preload and adverse effects in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients, particularly those with left ventricular ejection fractions <40%. Data were retrospectively analyzed from the Cardiomedics ECP Registry on 127 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV CHF patients (79.6% men; average age +/- SD, 68.2+/-15.6 years), with a comorbidity of CCSF class III-IV refractive angina, who were serially treated with 35 hours of ECP (1 h/d, 5 d/wk for 7 weeks) at unconventionally low pressures and D/S ratios under a new graduated pressure regimen. The pressures and D/S ratios were gradually increased in stages over the 7-week ECP regimen. The patients were divided into three groups based on the pressures applied and the resulting average D/S ratios (Low, Mid, and High). In the Low D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 0.7:1), all-cause mortality in the year following ECP treatment was only 1.85% (one of 54 patients), whereas over the same time period in the Mid D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 1.08:1), all-cause mortality was 7.69% (three of 39 patients) and in the High D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 1.32:1), all-cause mortality was 8.82% (three of 34 patients). For the Low, Mid, and High D/S ratio groups, respectively: 1) average left ventricular ejection fractions increased 23.0%, 20.1%, and 17.5%; 2) NYHA class declined 36.6%, 29.6%, and 29.6%; and 3) all-cause hospitalizations, including terminal admissions, were reduced 85.7%, 82.6%, and 57.1% in the year following ECP therapy from the prior year. There were no adverse effects or withdrawals from the ECP therapy and no significant difference in sex-based outcomes. Consequently, ECP applied at low pressures and average D/S ratios of 0.7:1 under the new graduated pressure regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of CHF and produces a significant reduction in mortality, compared with the 8.5% annualized mortality of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) (N=1232) of NYHA class II-III CHF and the 12.2% annual mortality of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) study (N=595) of NYHA class III-IV CHF. Lower pressures improve patient comfort and may encourage more CHF patients to seek treatment. The reduction in hospitalizations should significantly reduce the cost of treating CHF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCongestive Heart FailureSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207