MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113401645 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.024032

Gravity dual of the Ising model

2012· article· en· W2113401645 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandra Castro, Matthias R. Gaberdiel, Thomas Hartman, Alexander Maloney, Roberto Volpato

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPartition function (quantum field theory)PhysicsConformal field theoryPotts modelMathematical physicsQuantum gravityIsing modelTorusPlanck lengthConformal mapQuantum mechanicsMathematicsQuantumGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluate the partition function of three-dimensional theories of gravity in the quantum regime, where the anti--de Sitter (AdS) radius is Planck scale and the central charge is of order one. The contribution from the AdS vacuum sector can---with certain assumptions---be computed and equals the vacuum character of a minimal model conformal field theory. The torus partition function is given by a sum over geometries which is finite and computable. For generic values of Newton's constant $G$ and the AdS radius $\ensuremath{\ell}$, the result has no Hilbert space interpretation, but in certain cases it agrees with the partition function of a known conformal field theory. For example, the partition function of pure Einstein gravity with $G=3\ensuremath{\ell}$ equals that of the Ising model, providing evidence that these theories are dual. We also present somewhat weaker evidence that the three-state and tricritical Potts models are dual to pure higher spin theories of gravity based on $SL(3)$ and ${E}_{6}$, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207