MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113419553 · doi:10.1139/t99-089

Numerical simulation of debris flows

2000· article· en· W2113419553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H Chen, C F Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideDebris flowConservation of massGeotechnical engineeringGeologyBilinear interpolationDebrisFinite element methodSmoothingMathematicsEngineeringMechanicsStructural engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key requirement in the assessment of landslide risk in such densely populated urban areas as Hong Kong consists of the prediction of potential runout distance or the extent of the subsequent debris flow. This paper presents a three-dimensional dynamic model of unsteady gravity-driven debris flow. The Lagrangian Galerkin finite element method is used to determine the nodal velocity and depth of soil column elements within the sliding mass, with the momentum and mass conservation mathematically closed within the soil column elements. The numerical solution also features a lumped mass matrix and a volume-weighted procedure. The method of least squares approximation plays a smoothing role which enhances stability and efficiency of the numerical solution scheme. The nodal elevation during sliding is obtained via a dynamic bilinear interpolation of the elevation function for the base of the sliding mass. Furthermore, the accuracy, robustness, and generality of this method are validated by experimental results. Its application to the Shum Wan Road landslide and the Fei Tsui Road landslide, both of which occurred during a heavy rainstorm in Hong Kong on 13 August 1995 and involved fatalities, gives reasonable results in comparison to the field observations. A variety of rheological constitutive relationships have already been coded in the present program to provide flexibility and adaptability in practical applications.Key words: debris flows, three-dimensional dynamic model, runout distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations191
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207