MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113603708 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5690

Regulation of B7.1 Costimulatory Molecule Is Mediated by the IFN Regulatory Factor-7 through the Activation of JNK in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Human Monocytic Cells

2005· article· en· W2113603708 on OpenAlexaff
Wilfred Lim, Katrina Gee, Sasmita Mishra, Ashok Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipopolysaccharideCell biologyChemistryImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The engagement of CD28 or CTLA-4 with B7.1 provides the essential second costimulatory signal that regulates the development of immune responses, including T cell activation, differentiation, and induction of peripheral tolerance. The signaling molecules and the transcription factors involved in B7.1 regulation are poorly understood. In this study we investigated the role of MAPKs in the regulation of LPS-induced B7.1 expression in human monocytes and the promonocytic THP-1 cells. Our results show that LPS-induced B7.1 expression in monocytic cells did not involve the activation of either p38 or ERKs. Using the JNK-specific inhibitor SP600125, small interfering RNAs specific for JNK1 and JNK2, and agents such as dexamethasone that inhibit JNK activation, we determined that LPS-induced B7.1 expression was regulated by JNK MAPK in both monocytes and THP-1 cells. In addition, we identified a distinct B7.1-responsive element corresponding to the IFN regulatory factor-7 (IRF-7) binding site in the B7.1 promoter responsible for the regulation of LPS-induced B7.1 transcription. Furthermore, SP600125 and dexamethasone inhibited LPS-induced IRF-7 activity. Taken together, these results suggest that LPS-induced B7.1 transcription in human monocytic cells may be regulated by JNK-mediated activation of the IRF-7 transcription factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207