Gordon Bailey and Noga Gayle, <em>Ideology: Structuring Identities in Contemporary Life.</em> Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2003, 175 pp., $24.95.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
R e c e n t l y, questions concerning the nature of citizenship and democracy have been a major preoccupation for both academics and policy makers.At the level of real existing relations, this state of affairs can be attributed to the ongoing and far-reaching effects of globalization.At the level of theory, this situation can be attributed to the introduction of poststructuralist and postmodernist theoretical paradigms.These factors, as well as the growing recognition that social formations of race, class, gender and sexuality exert a determinant influence at the level of real existing relations and theory, have made it imperative that we revisit key modernist concepts such as citizenship, the nation-state, nationalism and democracy.Within academic circles these debates have not been restricted to political scientists.Theorists from a variety of disciplines have weighed in on the subject.In the context of these debates, many scholars have noted the problems associated with key elements of the modernist paradigm.However, little progress has been made towards posing workable alternatives.In their book, Ideology: Structuring Identities in Contemporary Life, two sociologists, Gordon Bailey and Noga Gayle, weigh in on the issue of citizenship.In the context of their discussion of contemporary political relations, they draw on the theoretical traditions of Marxism, postmodernism and poststructuralism.Their conceptual framework privileges the concept of ideology and the process of identity formation.In
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".