Fast vector quantization algorithms based on nearest partition set search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fast search method for vector quantization is proposed in this paper. It makes use of the fact that in the generalized Lloyd algorithm (GLA) a vector in a training sequence is either placed in the same minimum distance partition (MDP) as in the previous iteration or in a partition within a very small subset of partitions. The proposed method searches for the MDP for a training vector only in this subset of partitions plus the single previous MDP. As the size of this subset is much smaller than the total number of codevectors, the search process is speeded up significantly. The creation of the subset is essential, as it has a direct effect on the improvement in computation time of the proposed method. The schemes that create the subset efficiently have been proposed. The proposed method generates a codebook identical to that generated using the GLA. It is simple and requires only minor modification of the GLA and a modest amount of additional memory. The experimental results show that the computation time of codebook training was improved by factors from 6.6 to 50.7 and from 5.8 to 70.4 for two test data sets when codebooks of sizes from N = 16 to 2048 were trained. The proposed method was also combined with an earlier published method to further improve the computation time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".