Effects of saline intake, sex, and season on Pekin duck osmoregulatory organ masses and comparison with wild Mallards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osmoregulatory organ masses of freshwater Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) do not differ between the sexes, but drinking saline induces changes that are sexually disparate in some organs. We examined relative size of organ masses of male and female Pekin ducks (that were domesticated from Mallards) and compared their responses to saline intake with those of Mallards. Organ masses of male and female Mallards do not differ in size. The liver and kidneys are heavier in female Pekin ducks and their digestive tract (except for the proventriculus and duodenum) is longer and heavier; male Pekin ducks have heavier salt glands. Mallards acclimated to saline drinking water have enlarged salt glands but not kidneys, adrenal glands, or Harderian glands, their proventriculus tends to be shorter and lighter, the jejunum longer in males, and the ileum longer and heavier in both sexes. In Pekin ducks that drink saline, the salt and Harderian glands are larger and their kidneys (but not adrenal glands) tend to be larger; the proventriculus is unaffected, but the small intestine is lighter, but not shorter, in females. Body, salt gland, Harderian gland, ventriculus, and duodenum masses vary seasonally in Pekin ducks. Discussion considers the effects of season and sex on relative organ masses and how saline-induced changes in them reflect domestication and may influence salt tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".