Differences in ischemia-reperfusion-induced endothelial changes in hearts perfused at constant flow and constant pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolated hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) exhibit depressed cardiac performance and alterations in subcellular function. Since hearts perfused at constant flow (CF) and constant pressure (CP) show differences in their contractile response to I/R, this study was undertaken to examine mechanisms responsible for these I/R-induced alterations in CF-perfused and CP-perfused hearts. Rat hearts, perfused at CF (10 ml/min) or CP (80 mmHg), were subjected to I/R (30 min global ischemia followed by 60 min reperfusion), and changes in cardiac function as well as sarcolemmal (SL) Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity, sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) uptake, and endothelial function were monitored. The I/R-induced depressions in cardiac function, SL Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, and SR Ca(2+)-uptake activities were greater in hearts perfused at CF than in hearts perfused at CP. In hearts perfused at CF, I/R-induced increase in calpain activity and decrease in nitric oxide (NO) synthase (endothelial NO synthase) protein content in the heart as well as decrease in NO concentration of the perfusate were greater than in hearts perfused at CP. These changes in contractile activity and biochemical parameters due to I/R in hearts perfused at CF were attenuated by treatment with l-arginine, a substrate for NO synthase, while those in hearts perfused at CP were augmented by treatment with N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, an inhibitor of NO synthase. The results indicate that the I/R-induced differences in contractile responses and alterations in subcellular organelles between hearts perfused at CF and CP may partly be attributed to greater endothelial dysfunction in CF-perfused hearts than that in CP-perfused hearts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".