Characterization of Alkaline Phosphatase Producing Bacteria Isolated from Thai Fermented Fish Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seventeen isolates of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) producing bacteria were screened and systematically studied. They were divided into 10 groups on the basis of their phenotypic characteristics and 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. The Gram-positive coccal isolates in Group I (3 isolates), Group II (3 isolates) and Group III (1 isolate) showed 99.2%, 99.5-99.7% and 99.8% sequences similarity to Staphylococcus saprophyticus, S. napalensis and S. sciuri, respectively. Each Gram-positive rod-shaped isolates in Group IV and V belonged to the genus Bacillus and was closely related to B. vietnamensis and B. safensis with 99.2% and 99.4% sequences similarity, respectively. The Gram-positive, moderately halophilic rod-shaped bacteria in Group VI (3 isolates), Group VII (1 isolate), Group VIII (1 isolate) and Group IX (2 isolates) were closely related to Virgibacillus halodenitrificans (98.5-99.1%), Oceanobacillus iheyensis (99.3%), Halobacillus mangrove (97.9%) and H. dabanensis (98.5-98.6%), respectively. One Gram-negative isolate of moderately halophilic bacterium (Group X) was closely related to Idiomarina zobelli (98.0%). They possessed phosphatase activities ranged from 10.08-70.96 U ml-1. The isolate NSW 13-2 (Group VI) showed the highest ALP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".